The structure decision, made with you
Hub or one site per location, argued from how your offices are named and where their patients come from, on the onboarding call.
The decision is whether your offices share one website or hold one each, and it is the first thing we settle. One hub pools reviews, articles and authority under a single brand while each office keeps its own page, its own schema and its own booking route. One site per location keeps offices separable, which matters when they trade under different names or may be sold. We build both, the finder and the routing are identical in each, and you can move between them later with redirects rather than a rebuild.
What it costs
A hub suits groups whose offices share a name and a market. Everything you publish works for every office: an article about clear aligners lifts all six locations rather than one, provider pages can be linked from any office the clinician works at, and a patient who knows the brand finds the whole group in one place. Marketing is run centrally, so there is one site to keep accurate rather than six. The cost is entanglement: every office lives under one domain, so an office that is sold has to be redirected out rather than handed over.
Separate sites suit groups where the offices are genuinely separate businesses to a patient: different trading names, different towns far enough apart that nobody searches across them, or a plan to sell or rebrand one office. Each site carries the same page structure underneath, so an office does not get a worse website for being separate. Nothing pools, which is the honest downside: an article written for one office does nothing for the others, and authority builds five times rather than once. Groups that expect to buy and sell practices usually accept that trade.
Whichever structure you pick, patients meet the same tool: they choose a service and type a town, and the finder resolves to the nearest office that offers it, with its hours today, the providers on site and a booking request that goes to that front desk. It is the difference between a patient reading an address list and a patient getting an appointment request in. On a hub the finder covers every office; on separate sites each site carries the finder scoped to its own office and its nearest siblings, so a full diary at one location still points somewhere useful.
Groups grow, and a website that makes growth expensive quietly discourages it. Adding an office to a ChairsideWeb site is a revision: you send the address, the hours, the providers and the services, and the office page, its schema, its finder entry and its booking route are built and live within the revision turnaround. There is no new subscription, no per-office fee and no rebuild. The same is true in reverse when an office closes or is sold: the page is retired and redirected so nothing that ranked turns into a dead end.
Hub or one site per location, argued from how your offices are named and where their patients come from, on the onboarding call.
Address, hours, parking, entrance notes, the providers on site, the services offered there and its own Dentist schema.
Service plus town to the nearest chair, with the hours and providers for that office and a booking request attached.
Each office keeps its own destination, whether that is a practice management system, a group CRM or both.
Hours, closures, providers and insurance changes emailed from any office and applied every week without using a revision.
One monthly fee covers the group however many offices you have. Adding one is a revision, not a new subscription.
Moving from separate sites to a hub, or the other way, is done with redirects rather than a rebuild.
Per group. One monthly fee covers every office on the site, however many you have, on a hub or on separate sites within the same plan. The one-time build fee is also charged once for the whole group.
Yes. We map every page to its new address, add 301 redirects from the old URLs and keep the old domains working as redirects for as long as you keep them registered. It is a revision-level project, not a rebuild.
Neither wins automatically. A hub concentrates authority so a new office page benefits from everything published before it. Separate sites keep each office unambiguous for its own town. What matters more than the choice is that every office has its own page, its own schema and its own address, which both structures give you.
No, and usually they should not. Different trading names is the clearest signal that one site per location fits better, because a hub would force a patient to accept a brand they have never heard of before reaching the office they searched for.
Every form, finder request and AI-taken booking carries the office, the provider and the service, and is delivered to that office's system by API, Zapier or Make. If one office changes its practice management system, only that office's routing changes.
A live walk-through of the site you would get, in about 30 minutes. Plans from $137 a month, the $797 build fee invoiced only after launch, domain and hosting included.
Book a demoOr email hello@chairsideweb.com and a person replies within one working day.
ChairsideWeb uses the cookies below. Necessary cookies keep the site working and cannot be turned off.
Saved on this device only. Press Esc to close.